Home AdisOnline Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Services Information
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 1, 2010 - Volume 8 - Issue 1 > Ongoing Pharmaceutical Reforms in France: Implications for K...
Applied Health Economics & Health Policy:
1 January 2010 - Volume 8 - Issue 1 - pp 7-24
doi: 10.2165/11313900-000000000-00000
Current Opinion

Ongoing Pharmaceutical Reforms in France: Implications for Key Stakeholder Groups

Sermet, Catherine; Andrieu, Veronique; Godman, Brian; Van Ganse, Eric; Haycox, Alan; Reynier, Jean-Pierre

Collapse Box

Abstract

The rapid rise in pharmaceutical costs in France has been driven by new technologies and the growing prevalence of chronic diseases as well as considerable prescribing freedom and choice of physician among patients. This has led to the introduction of a number of reforms and initiatives in an attempt to moderate expenditure whilst ensuring universal coverage and rewarding innovation. These reforms include accelerating access to and granting average European prices for new innovative drugs, delisting drugs where there are concerns over their value and instigating rebates for excessive prescribing. Alongside this, ongoing initiatives to improve the quality and efficiency of prescribing include programmes to enhance generic prescribing and dispensing as well as to reduce antibacterial and anxiolytic/hypnotic prescribing.

However, there have been few publications documenting the impact of specific reforms on the overall costs and quality of care, which have been exacerbated by compartmentalization of budgets. Estimates suggest savings of over €27 million/year by decreasing antibacterial prescribing, €450 million/year by not reimbursing ineffective drugs, €670 million/year from pharmaceutical company rebates and approximately €1 billion/year from increased prescribing and dispensing of generics (year 2003–7 values). Additional savings of at least €1.5 billion/year are seen as being possible from increased use of generics such as generic proton pump inhibitors, statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) and ACE inhibitors instead of current branded products such as angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]).

Delisting drugs when there are concerns about their value provides an example to other countries with currently limited demand-side measures. Other possible examples include price : volume agreements and multifaceted campaigns to enhance generic prescribing and dispensing and reduce antibacterial prescribing.

Possible future initiatives could include adopting more stringent criteria for categorizing new drugs as innovative as well as further reductions in the prices of generics. Other initiatives could include further enhancement of the quality and efficiency of prescribing, including formal auditing of physician prescribing, as well as increasing efforts to monitor the risk : benefit ratio of new drugs post-launch in real-world practice.

Copyright 2010 Adis Data Information BV

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Article Collections
Purchase a collection of leading topical articles hand-picked by the Editor, offering significant savings on the combined individual article prices.

Health Policy in the US
5 Articles   PPV Package Price  US $63

A saving of US $187.25

Preventative Strategies for Population Health
6 Articles   PPV Package Price  US $75

A saving of US $224.70